Sunday, August 17, 2014

Robert Chevillon 2008's, 6 years on

Impressive showing by 2008 lineup from Robert Chevillon at our local wine shop Vin Vino Wine. The vintage is starting to approach the window of drinkability. High-acidity is a common attribute of 2008 red burgundies in general, and it's true for Chevillon as well. The Nuits-Saint-Georges "meatiness" comes through in spades in these wines. Spice combined with acidity gives them attractive savoriness that contributes to complexity. Most of the wines are still 2-5 years away from optimal drinking IMO. As the fruit is ripe, acidity will carry them a long time without distorting balance, the wines should continue to mellow out and integrate. We have much to look forward to.

Tasting notes

Robert Chevillon 2008 Nuits-Saint-Georges "Vieilles Vignes" - nose: hibiscus and herbs, at the peak. Palate: good chocolate and spice flavor but finishes very short as flavor fades almost immediately, this is light and savory without enough substance. Uninspiring.

Robert Chevillon 2008 Nuits-Saint-Georges "Les Bousselots" - deeper nose. Palate: deep sexy spice, good acidity balanced by rich red berry and chocolate inflected fruit. Moderate complexity. Nice.

Robert Chevillon 2008 Nuits-Saint-Georges "Les Chaignots" - smoother texture, more feminine, broader nose and palate, herbaceous spice, but in a good subtle way, seems more complex, and the "softness" shouldn't be confused for lack of intensity. Quite good.

Robert Chevillon 2008 Nuits-Saint-Georges "Les PerriƩres" - nose: earth, herbs and minerals. Palate: ooh! silky smooth mouth-feel, suave, beef, tomato, herbs, classical burg, sweet red-fruited aftertaste, still slightly tannic. Favorite so far. Give it 2-3 years. A beauty.

Robert Chevillon 2008 Nuits-Saint-Georges "Les RonciƩres" - less expressive nose. Very spicy palate, lively acid, rich fruit, stone / slate, toast, intense, quite primary, hibiscus tea. With time, tannins become noticeable, texture quite unpolished at this point (I think due to youth), unlike the prior two wines. Has the components to be very good in 3-5 years, but too young and primary right now. This wine clearly comes across as more powerful and less developed than the previous bunch.

Robert Chevillon 2008 Nuits-Saint-Georges "Les Vaucrains" - nose evocative of deep cave, not revealing all its secrets, put power lurking beneath, herbs (somewhat reminiscent of Bordeaux). Palate: tannic, more savage, leather, coffee grinds, spice, masculinity, really delicious flowers/herbs, should be pretty special with few more years (3-5). A beauty in the making, a bit less Pinot-like than the others, quite true to the reputation of the Vaucrains terroir, with leanings toward Bordeaux / Barolo.

Overall, other than the somewhat disappointing NSG villages (I think 2007, 2009, and 2010 were better), this is a very satisfying line-up. Perrieres is the most enjayable wine at the moment, with silky suave texture. Roncieres is step up in intensity, but needs more time, while Vaucrains is at another level, as it should be. We were not presented with Cailles and Les Saint Georges, but I can extrapolate that those wines would be equally if not more impressive.

Friday, May 2, 2014

2012 Vintage in Chateauneuf-du-Pape is Good

Recent annual tasting by AWA (Angeles Wine Agency) afforded me the first broad look at the 2012 vintage in Chateauneuf-du-Pape. These were all barrel samples that will start rolling out as finished wines in 3-6 months. I have to admit, I don't drink much Chateauneuf, as the wines tend to be heavy and jammy in their youth, and require IMO at least 7-10 years of age before they soften, attenuate and may (or may not) reveal marvelous complexity of flavor. A typical young Chateauneuf has neither the elegance nor freshness nor nuance. It's a big corpulent hairy blob. So when a vintage with some refinement, some delineation, some backbone comes along, I get excited.

Two years ago when I first tasted the 2010's, my initially low expectations led to a huge positive surprise - that vintage turned out absolutely stellar. Last year, the 2011's disappointed. This year, I am pleased to say that the 2012's are a big step up from the '11's, and are not far behind the '10's. In fact, 2010 and 2012 are quite close in profiles - ripe and concentrated (but not jammy), with discernible flavors of black olives, meats, pepper and Provencal herbs. They are still thick and fruity (they are CdP's after all!), but you can already see past all that richness and into the kaleidoscopically magic future. The 2012's are not quite as built as the 2010's, and thus they are a bit more approachable. But that's not to say that they lack structure. Many wines possess textbook tannic backbones surrounded by dense fruit with balancing acidity. I would say these are poster-boy Chateauneuf-du-Pape's - and for anyone who wants to understand and appreciate the appellation for what it is, I think this is the vintage to dive in.

Overall, I couldn't help but draw vintage comparisons to Burgundy, in the sense how 2012, 2011, and 2010 vintages related to each other. In both regions, 2010 was the most intense, structured and overall best vintage in a decade IMO. 2011's were softer, and quite appealing to the lovers of those regions. However, while 2011 burgundies are generally wonderfully fresh, elegant, and balanced, a year ago I found many 2011 Chateauneuf-du-Pape's out of balance and on the super-sweet side. Finally, the 2012's are sort of an in-between version of 2010 and 2011, closer to 2010. As a result, I am happy to recommend the wines for medium-to-long term cellaring. While majority of the wines were good, I was most impressed with Le Vieux Donjon (on the peppery side) and Olivier Hillaire (power-house showing). I would not touch any them for a minimum of 5 years, and twice that for Olivier Hillaire cuvee "Les Petits Pieds d'Armand".

Friday, April 25, 2014

Great Wines of the World. Tasting at Tango

I run a wine tasting club at Tango. It's a great perk for employees, especially when their VP of Engineering (i.e. yours truly) personally invests time and energy to entertain and educate. About a third of the company attends, it's popular. To celebrate our recent D round ($280M) and passing 200m registered users, we splurged a little bit. See for yourself - this was a mesmerizing line-up of some of the world's greatest wines. Chave and Quintarelli were jaw-droppingly, mind-bogglingly great. Others - very good too.

Tasting notes:

JL Chave Hermitage blanc 2009 - wow, amazing wine, depth, complexity, impact! Up there with top grand cru white burgundy.

Marquis d'Angerville Volnay 1er "Clos des Ducs" monopole 2006 - top wine from Volnay, complex and interesting, secondary notes, but a bit medicinal / pine-needle and in need of more time to smooth out the remaining tannins. I suspect that 2006 was not the greatest vintage of this legendary wine.

Giacomo Conterno Barolo Cascina Francia 2009 - opulent and luscious Barolo consistent with the 2009 Barolo vintage. Lacking a bit of cool classic structure for me.

Calon-Segur Bordeaux 1995 - very classic, balanced Bordeaux 3rd growth, good depth of fruit, acidity, in a sweet spot of development but nowhere near the end, good but not amazing.

Dunn Howell Mountain 2003 - very good and tasty, many people's favorite, and one of my favorite Dunn vintages in the 2000's. Not quite as complex as some of the other wines, but a pleasure nonetheless.

JL Chave Hermitage rouge 2008 - beautiful wine, super complex and expressive, pepper, herbs, cured meat, beautiful silky texture, and lots of other things, not a powerful blockbuster like 2009 and 2010, but drinking well right now, at half the price.

Quintarelli Amarone 2003 - wow, almost port-like without being heavy, but dry, super luxurious, super complex and exotic. Amazing. Watch out for 16.5% alc.!

Warre's Vintage Port 1980 - very good, but maybe not old enough or complex enough for my taste. Good, but perhaps just ok, especially after Quintarelli. Still pretty fascinating to be drinking a 34 year old wine and calling it "not old enough"...

Willi Schaefer 2011 Graacher Domprobst Beerenauselese - deliciously sweet, classically balanced and luscious, but not amazing enough to justify a $170+ price tag for 375ml IMHO. For almost the same money, I strongly suspect that 2011 d'Yquem is a much more impressive wine.

So there you have it. Tango Winos were very pleased and slightly tipsy. Good times!

Sunday, March 16, 2014

La Paulee San Francisco 2014. The 2011 Burgundy vintage confirmed.

The 2011 line-up of great burgundies, a celebration of celebrations that takes place once every two years in San Francisco, and a must-attend for a serious Burgundy lover, did not disappoint. I've written about this glorious tasting in the past, and this was my third time covering the event. On March 15, the long-awaited La Paulee came to San Francisco again, and the 2011's on display confirmed my positive impression of the 2011 vintage so far - there were many very good and even brilliant wines, with much great drinking to look forward to in the next 15 years, and even a lot to enjoy in the relatively immediate future as many wines are already quite delicious.

As usual, the food at this event is top-notch. Tons of amazing gourmet bites from top restaurants...

Three producers stood out for me.

Armand Rousseau. That's Eric Rousseau in the photo below - the current owner of the domain, holding his precious Chambertin Grand Cru. One month ago I tasted a barrel sample of the 2012 Chambertin. In comparison, this 2011 seemed tastier and more approachable, while I recall the 2012 being thicker and more monolithic, which makes sense in the context of the respective vintages. The entire Rousseau line-up was excellent. I think the 1er Cru "Lavaux St-Jacques" is a beautiful wine. But the Chambertin is a pinnacle. It was hard to fully appreciate this $2000/bottle beauty in all the ruckus around me.

Domaine Fourrier. Jean-Marie and his wife Vicki. The 1er's were juicy, precise, and joy to drink. The Clos St. Jacques quite special.

Even Mr. Daniel Johnnes himself - the famous sommelier and the organizer of the La Paulee event, was giving a hand at the Fourrier table.

Marquis d'Angerville. Gloriously delicious, balanced, clean, refined, joyous wines. Mr. Guillaume d'Angerville holding his famous Clos des Ducs - Volnay's most famous wine.

Other producers made excellent wines too. I will comment specifically under each photo below.

Hudelot-Noellat - very tasty wines. The Romanee St. Vivant was quite fine.

Domaine des Lambrays didn't blow me away in 2011.

Bouchard - the "baby Jesus" was a stand-out, with lots of depth and sap. Both whites where quite good too, but I preferred the Meursault Genevrieres (I also tasted the 2011 Meausault Perrieres in other events, and thought that was excellent too.)  Always nice to see Luc Bouchard (and Tanya the rep) brighten the pages of this blog!

I thought both of Drouhin's whites on display - the Chassagne-Montrachet Morgeot 1er, and Corton-Charlemagne were very good. The reds - forgettable.

Pierre-Yves Colin Morey showed in good form. (The man - Pierre Yves Colin - clearly looks bigger in person than on the photos on the internet, btw). No disappointments here - good flavorful white burgundies across the board.

Very serious Clos de La Roche from Hospices de Beaune

This was a very nice palate cleanser! I quite enjoyed the '02 Delamotte on several occasions.

Always great to catch up with Erwan Faiveley. I liked the 2011 Latricieres-Chambertin quite a bit! (on the heels of my recent tasting of his 1993 Latricieres, documented here.)

Jadot's Corton-Charlemagne was good, but Clos Vougeot was truly impressive.

Domaine de Courcel's wines from Cote de Beaune were good, but suffered, following the glorious wines from Marquis d'Angerville.

Similar note about de Montille - good but d'Angerville was a hard act to follow.

Dominique Lafon of Domaine des Comtes Lafon. Always super solid in both whites and red.

Sauzet also solid, tastes like classic burgundy, more understated than Colin-Morey, I must stay. Oooh, that Chevalier-Montrachet!

Christian Moreau is a good value, good quality Chablis, but clearly not in the league of Dauvissat / Raveneau.

Francois Carillon also solid and flavorful.

I wish I had more time, but alas three hours blew by like a whirlwind, and I only got to taste about 70% of what was being poured. Perhaps enough time to form impressions, but surely not enough to properly assess or appreciate the wines. I am inspired to purchase more 2011's now, with a bit more confidence. Certainly not as across-the-board great power-vintage like 2010 and not as seductive as 2009, the 2011 offers a lot of charm, appeal and excellent juicy drinkability, and in many cases within a shorter maturity window.

Tuesday, March 4, 2014

Five decades of world's great wines, with truffles! Benefit Dinner for Bing Harvest Moon Auction

For those not familiar with Bing, it is not just a cherry or a search engine. We first learned about Bing almost 3 years ago when Rona solicited preschool recommendations from our Crescent Park neighbors for our then new-born son. Located in Stanford and part of the university research program in child development, Bing is a cozy idyllic oasis of child happiness and learning that parents aspire to get their offspring to be immersed in. We're eager to get to know the Bing community as Evan is fast-approaching preschool age. So at the Bing Harvest Moon Auction last fall, we donated a rare wine tasting to be hosted at the Domaine du Chevsky (i.e. my home) in Palo Alto. As all proceeds from this event go to the Bing Scholarship Fund, we were super excited to put this great extravaganza together.

There are wine tastings.... And then there are IRON CHEVSKY wine tastings. The event was intended for a relatively small group, sized to sample several rarities without getting tipsy. We had 9 guests, plus Rona and I - a perfect number for 2oz. pours of 5 wines, just the right amount for a wine aficionado's experience of a lifetime. The theme - five great wines from around the world, spanning five decades. Food pairings featuring fresh truffles executed by my friend chef Dan-the-gour-man(d), aimed to highlight delicate flavors and aromas in these venerable wines. I led the presentation and the discussion throughout the three hour sit-down event.

Now, the wines!

Most old wines are just that - old, tired, fruitless, thin, funky... over the hill. Automatic expectation people have for old wine - is that older is better. In reality, that is not the case most of the time. While many wines can improve or at least plateau for a few years after release, very few will be better after 10 years, let alone 20, 30, or 50. Without the supporting anti-oxidative structure of tannin, acid, extract, and sometimes sugar, most wines simply fall apart after a while. But, some varieties produced in great vintages from venerable terroirs by capable winemakers, and stored under meticulous temperature-controlled conditions, can endow wines with incredible longevity. In those rare few cases, wines may gain complexity, convert the youthful fruitiness and intensity into suave secondary and tertiary flavors that are otherworldly, with soft textures enveloping your tongue like a warm blanket on a cold night... Enhanced by the right food, aimed to compliment not dominate the wines, this can be a rapturous experience. That is what we wished to create with this tasting event that took months of preparation.

Naturally wines of such caliber and rarity are not cheap. Considering that no self-respecting wine host would go without a backup bottle of each wine, valued at hundreds of $$ a bottle on today's market, was it worth it?! I say a resounding Yes!

Opening the '66 Montrose mag with the trusty "old cork" Durand corkscrew

To pick a fitting representation of world's great wines obviously is not an easy feat, if you only have room for five. I needed wines of tremendous pedigree from world-class regions and producers with long track records for age-worthiness. After much consideration, I settled on 1988 Veuve Cliquot Champagne (France), 1971 Barisone (Francesco Rinaldi) Barolo (Italy), 1993 Domaine Faiveley red Burgundy (France), 1966 Chateau Montrose Bordeaux (France), and 2003 Bond Napa Valley Cabernet (USA). The wines either came from my cellar or from highly reputable sources at least one month before the tasting, and rested sideways in my cellar to recover from any potential bottle shock. About a week prior to the event, I stood them all upright to get the sediment to collect at the bottom. Sediment is always expected in older wines, and getting it to shift to the bottom makes pouring clean liquid out of the bottle a lot easier.

Before sitting down for the formal tasting, guests were greeted with a glass of one of my favorite non-vintage Champagnes - Vilmart Grand Cellier.

NV Vilmart "Grand Cellier" Champagne Brut Premier Cru - I've stored this bottle for several years since release, and it was singing. Excellent NV Brut. Intense, full-bodied, zesty, refreshing. With few years of age, it has rounded out and put on weight. Great prelude to the '88 Veuve.

The formal tasting and food pairing followed.

1988 "Rare" Vintage Veuve Clicquot Champagne Brut - pop and pour, no decanting. Late-disgorged in 2005, after 17 years in the Veuve Clicquot cellars, 2/3rd Pinot Noir, 1/3rd Chardonnay, I had enjoyed this wine multiple times over the past few years, and on this occasion it was firing on all cylinders - energetic, complex and full of classical mature champagne flavors of toast, brioche, almonds, honey, candied ginger, and distant oxidative notes. Perfection with butternut squash blitzes (mini-pancakes) topped with creme fraiche and a dollop of black caviar - the only dish I made myself, as the rest were Dan's masterpieces.

1993 Faiveley Latricieres-Chambertin Grand Cru Burgundy - We happen to know Erwan Faiveley through a mutual friend. The 34 year old took over one of the largest domaines in Burgundy 7 years ago from his father Francois Faiveley as the 7th generation owner. Well educated, ambitious and capable, Erwan set out to raise the bar for Domaine Faiveley. Rona was impressed with the understated and easy-going young Frenchman, so she requested a Faiveley for the burgundy portion of this important tasting. I'm glad I obliged! I opened and let the bottle sit for 1.5 hours prior to tasting, no decanting. Gorgeously perfumey honeyed strawberries and red cherries, with classic forest floor, whiffs of truffle, subtle game and smoke notes, gentle spice and soft, elegant, inviting texture - the wine at its peak, paired fantastically with Dan's Parmesan "curl" with truffles, honey and smoked salt (in the photo below), as well as the second hors d'oeuvre - wild boar truffle salami over truffle spread on a baguette. Domaine Faiveley has sometimes been criticized for wines lacking refinement, particularly in their youth. Well, this 21 year old "grand cru" beauty was plenty refined for me, demonstrating with clarity what proper aging will do to a great wine! Latricieres-Chambertin grand cru vineyard in Gevrey-Chambertin is one of the staples of the Faiveley portfolio, and while the vineyard has plots owned by many, Faiveley is one of the top producers of that grand terroir, along with Leroy. Erwan visited Domaine du Chevsky last year and personally advised about the '93 Latricieres as follows: "This wine is extremely perfumed and not very powerful. I am very excited: I get the impression 2013 will be just like 93 in Gevrey.... I am sure you will be blown away!"

1971 Barisone Barolo - (backup bottle, as the first one was oxidized) Opened and let the bottle sit for 2 hours prior to tasting, no decanting. Sweet tobacco and tea, woodsy tones, delicious compote of tart prunes, hints of dry cherries, baked raspberries and truffles... spectacular with Dan's truffle risotto. This Barolo was made in 1971 by the famous Francesco Rinaldi, and sold in demijohns to Osvaldo Barisone to his wine shop in Turin and subsequently bottled under his own label. Delicious and complex wine, hard to pick which one was more enjoyable - this or the '93 Faiveley Latricieres before it. For me personally, I slightly preferred the brighter, gentler red fruit of the Burgundy to the Barolo's woodsier, more tobaccoey overtones... but some other tasters preferred the Barolo, particularly the pairing with the truffle risotto.

Both reds melded with the food in a truffle orgy.

1966 Chateau Montrose Grand Cru Classe Bordeaux (2nd growth, St. Estephe) - out of a magnum, the backbone of the wine was still there with certain musculine angularity. After 3-4 hour decant, the wine got plusher. Fruit still alive, albeit somewhat leaner than I would prefer. Nuances of menthol, graphite, and grilled meat. Acidity sticking out just a bit... Very good, especially with Dan's spectacular rare "USDA prime filet mignon tail" steak, with truffle demi-glace, but not as epic as I'd hoped.

2003 Bond Estate (Harlan) Cabernet Sauvignon "Pluribus" - first vintage of this boutique wine from the Pluribus vineyard on Spring Mountain in Napa Valley, bought on release, this wine is all the Napa Valley opulence one would expect from one of the New World's cultiest producers. Having visited and written about the highly exclusive Bond Estate in the past, their single-vineyard "Napa grand cru" philosophy, attention to quality and no-expense-spared pursuit of perfection are widely regarded. I had kept the wine in a decanter for 9 hours before we drank it, and it was still a monster (in a good way!) with richly supple but formidable tannins, loads of dense, intense, inky blue fruits, chocolate and graphite, covering every corner of the palate. We paired it with high-quality Belgian chocolate truffles, and it was a match made in heaven. Serious wine that will probably go for another 30 years. Try again in 10!

As if those weren't enough, I pulled a couple of bonus "post-dinner" bottles to enjoy with cheeses.

2006 Ridge Monte Bello Cabernet Sauvignon - pop and pour, no decanting. Great wine, lighter and less extracted than Bond, olive tapenade, more acidity, very food friendly. Certainly would have been more enjoyable if drunk before the more powerful Bond. World-famous Ridge Vineyards is IMHO the greatest American winery that has secured its place atop the vinous Olympus of the New World with a glorious track record and adoration of wine lovers for the past 40+ years. While (thankfully) it doesn't seem to have the exclusivity or the stratospheric price tag of Napa Valley's top trophy cabs (many of which have been covered on the pages of this blog), the jewel of Santa Cruz Mountains, Ridge Monte Bello estate achieves a remarkable combination of deep dark pure cool mountain fruit combined with great acidity and hints of olives, herbs, and eucalyptus, all in a relatively low-alcohol package. The Monte Bello Cabernet Sauvignon is Ridge's top wine, but their entire wide range is of very high quality, and carries the familiar Ridge signature of beautifully intense, polished and characterful fruit, balanced by mouth-watering acidity across a number of wines made from a variety of different grapes. I've visited and written about them many times, and I cannot recommend their wines highly enough. The 2006 Monte Bello has been one of my favorites on prior occasions, although pretty much every vintage I ever tried (and I tried many) has been terrific.

2003 Caymus Napa Valley Cabernet - pop and pour, no decanting. Bought on release, this was richer, sweeter, fruitier, more exotic and glycerous than Monte Bello, but definitely not a fruit bomb. Dark fruited and very good, and could easily go another 10+ years.

In the end, we were delighted the way the wines and food came out. The audience and the hosts got to know each other and the wines in an amazing evening, brought together by a good cause, that we will not soon forget.

Related Posts with Thumbnails